what's the most dishonest word?

Discuss whatever you want here--both QB and non-QB related. Anything from the DEF INT command to the meaning of life!

Moderators: Pete, Mods

Post Reply
mennonite

what's the most dishonest word?

Post by mennonite » Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:02 am

what is the most dishonest word in the english language?

(alternatively, what is the most nebulous concept in the english langauge? i'll tolerate oxymorons, but i'm hoping people won't participate in this one without either giving a word of their own or at least supporting a word that has already been given.)

my entry: Proof.

the concept of "proof" will not protect the truth or shellac it into place. once the "truth" (whatever that could be) has been proven it will still be debated. even truth is challenged in the future. using the word "proof" will never ultimately protect anything from future scrutiny.

on the other hand, saying a lie has been "proven" to be truth will slow down someone saying "wait a minute, but that's not true at all..." after all, there's proof. and there's an "end" to it.

while i believe (to a limited degree) in the more honest idea of "evidence..." at least it carries the idea that there's a chance it is imperfect or might even be nothing at all... the idea of proof strikes me as extremely dishonest, like a man standing in front of a building with flames and smoke issuing from the roof saying "alright folks, nothing to see here."

well of course there's smoke and fire, what he means is "please ignore what's right in front of you, and *pretend* there's nothing to see here." in the case of a building that could fall over and harm you, sometimes it might be best for people to ignore it. however, it's still dishonest (at least, untrue) to tell people it's "nothing," and that's the whole point.

so if "proof" is not the most dishonest word in the english language, what is?

would love your thoughts on it.

MystikShadows
Veteran
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 7:36 am
Contact:

Post by MystikShadows » Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:06 am

I would say truth is the most dishonest word. And that's the truth ;-).

Seriously though. When you think of it, what is truth? It's what we've been tought to believe is true. But what is it? Truth, depending on the context has many meanings. Today, Illusionists has shown is that what we believe we see, hear, feel, smell or touch, may or may not be truth. If it's not the must dishonest word in the dictionary, it's definitaly the most hypocritical. :-).
When God created light, so too was born, the first Shadow!

MystikShadows

Need hosting? http://www.jc-hosting.net

Interested in Text & ASCII development? Look no further!
http://www.ascii-world.com

mennonite

hmm :)

Post by mennonite » Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:34 am

love your answer. i almost think the two are synonymous, at least here... but that's the whole thing isn't it?

using "proof" you can turn a lie (something that exists) into "truth"... which may or may not.

of course, i believe it's possible to be "truthful" as it's a matter of intention. "lie" also denotes intention. but "truth" indicates purity, information without flaw, perfection... and isn't really the opposite of "lie" at all... usually it's a bit of a lie in and of itself.

thanks for your post, it was cool.

MystikShadows
Veteran
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 7:36 am
Contact:

Post by MystikShadows » Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:22 am

LOL you're very welcome :-)....
When God created light, so too was born, the first Shadow!

MystikShadows

Need hosting? http://www.jc-hosting.net

Interested in Text & ASCII development? Look no further!
http://www.ascii-world.com

guest

Post by guest » Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:31 am

i'll go with "polititian" the most corrupt profession
it assumes consensus amoung many other shades
of camoflauge but never is...

Guest

Re: hmm :)

Post by Guest » Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:32 am

[quote="mennonite"]
using "proof" you can turn a lie (something that exists) into "truth"... which may or may not.

quote]

you'll like the old quote then...

nothing is so absurd that if not repeated often enough
becomes fact...

mennonite

heh

Post by mennonite » Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

i agree with you, but i'm not going to help this become a political thread after starting a religious one not long ago :) you're on your own there. although it did remind me of another smirking maxim: "if it's not working, do more of it."

User avatar
Pete
Site Admin
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Candor, NY
Contact:

Post by Pete » Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:32 pm

There's no such thing as a dishonest word. Only people can be dishonest. Words are just tools used to communicate, whether or not the messages they send are legitimate.

mennonite

thats a good point pete, you'd like my other thread

Post by mennonite » Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:17 pm

in the qbasic forum, where i'm better known at least, this thread is called "the most nebulous word"...

while i may have phrased it in a way that's less... accurate here (your point is valid) the idea is that these are words that lend themselves to dishonesty because they point to things that either do not exist, cannot exist, or are not likely to exist.

they may not be dishonest, in and of themselves, but they are certainly nebulous. imagine the conceptual equivilent of "return without gosub"... "return? wha? return from Where?"

althought i agree with you, your post does unfortunately (it's not your fault) remind me of the "guns don't kill people" argument. no one on this forum (and probably no one on the other forum) could guess my stance on gun rights, but i do like what eddie izzard said: "i think the gun helps... i just think just standing there going, 'Bang!' that's not going to kill too many people, is it? you'd have to be really dodgy on the heart to have that."

no, words are not dishonest, and i wouldn't strike any of them from the language, (i absolutely love how free your site is.) but if we are going to use and read words that are typically used in a dodgy fashion, it's best to know they are so we can parse them... after all, whether "people" are behind them or not, it's best not to ever look into the barrel of a gun. chances are it won't kill you on its own :) another version: "computers don't make mistakes," it requires human error. well, okay, but humans can make bigger errors with computers than they can without them. like the atom bomb that needed all the calculations to be built properly. but then atom bombs don't kill people... :D

User avatar
matt2jones
Veteran
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:29 am
Location: elsewhere
Contact:

Post by matt2jones » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:28 am

guns don't kill people
I like to look at it this way. Guns don't kill people, bullets do.

bullets don't MURDER people, humans do.

And killing isn't whats illegal or detrimental to society, murder is.

matt - likes the sound of the word murder. (19 today BTW)
Do not mistake Apathy for feeling Content.

http://www.disjointed.cjb.net - Short Storys
http://matt2jones.deviantart.com - Random Art
http://www.freewebs.com/matt2jones - WebComic

MystikShadows
Veteran
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 7:36 am
Contact:

Post by MystikShadows » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:50 am

lol....well happy birthday matt :-)...19 huh? wow...I remember when I was that age...lol....
When God created light, so too was born, the first Shadow!

MystikShadows

Need hosting? http://www.jc-hosting.net

Interested in Text & ASCII development? Look no further!
http://www.ascii-world.com

mennonite

and many more

Post by mennonite » Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:57 pm

hey, happy birthday matt...

of course, the best way to kill someone with a bullet is to put it in a gun, and then have a person shoot the gun, but monkeys work too.

the rest of the routine went something like: "guns dont kill people, people do, but sometimes monkeys do, if they've got a gun."

you could also throw the bullet, really, really hard. or you could stab someone with it, but i recommend a sword. but swords don't kill people! only long blades do. so if you have a sword with no blade on it, that won't hurt anyone... unless you beat them with it or something. wait, maybe swords are more dangerous than i thought... hey, this has nothing to do with the thread at all :( but it is fun though :)

Post Reply