What computing needs is...

Discuss whatever you want here--both QB and non-QB related. Anything from the DEF INT command to the meaning of life!

Moderators: Pete, Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Patz QuickBASIC Creations
Veteran
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Contact:

What computing needs is...

Post by Patz QuickBASIC Creations » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:21 pm

Feel free to add to this list.

A free open-sourced FileSystem which would be easily accessed in any Operating System. NTFS is too closed off, EXT2 is losing it's usefulness to journaling filesystems, like EXT3. Many others are supported, but not as much. So far I only find FAT32 to be easily accessed by Linux and Windows...

DrV
Veteran
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:44 pm

Post by DrV » Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:54 pm

Apparently, you can access ext3 (and ext2) file systems from Windows with this thing: http://www.fs-driver.org/

In any case, I've given up on running multiple OSes on one box, so Samba/Windows file sharing works just fine for file transfer.

What computing really needs is quieter, cooler equipment and less moving parts. Traditional hard disks need to die.

Guest
Veteran
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Contact:

Post by Guest » Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:58 pm

A powerful, stable OS with Universal Binary Compatiblity, no need to build anything from source(unless you choose yourself), one click install, and viral invulnerability

User avatar
{Nathan}
Veteran
Posts: 1169
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: The wetlands of central Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by {Nathan} » Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:42 am

Linux. That's what it needs. With:

Free CD shipping (Ubuntu)
1 click installation
Great, fast commandline, but you don't have to use it (for the n00bs)
Better driver compatibility between OSes (Like ndiswrapper)
Better use for 64 bit processors (I had to switch to 32-bit linux...)

Computers:
New floppy drive system & floppies (They COULD be more usefull)
Better cooling systems (Fans?! ???!)
Remote control controlling (like turning on, off, ect)

Software:
A programming languege that is multi-platform, simple, and fast...

WAIT! Thats freebasic!
Image

User avatar
Patz QuickBASIC Creations
Veteran
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Patz QuickBASIC Creations » Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:22 pm

Billgatus of Borg wrote:A powerful, stable OS
Anything is 'powerful'. Stable: Linux
Billgatus of Borg wrote:with Universal Binary Compatiblity
Windows is the closest, since most programs that come precompiled are for Windows.
Billgatus of Borg wrote:no need to build anything from source(unless you choose yourself)
Any OS except Linux (being general). But, not all Linux programs have to, though.
Billgatus of Borg wrote:one click install,
Windows and MAC OS X
Billgatus of Borg wrote:and viral invulnerability
UNIX-based OSes (MAC OS X included)


Speaking of MAC OS X, the one thing that drives me away from it is the fact that you have a different architecture to run it on. If MAC OS X were released for PCs, then I would use it :) (the closest you're gonna get so far) Having the 'Intel' MACs released confused me at first. I thought they were going to be i486 architecture, not some PPC-imitation Intel chip. (grrrrr!)

bungytheworm
Veteran
Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:02 pm

Post by bungytheworm » Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:57 am

Ill ratherly do some "real" installing instead of "clikck and play", what is very common on M$ os's.

Anyway, i can see some major changes in near future of computers.
Peoples skills and experiences with computers grows all the time. Peoples can and prolly wants to do/know more than "click yes to install". Computer is allmost one of those "kitchen words".

Here just came 3G mobile phones. Practically, it's computer on phone. I dont think it takes long anymore when computer, phone, tv etc. are really, one and same machine and it controls then so much that peoples definately wana know more about em than just "click and play". Alltho, updating tv by compiling code from source aint prolly either what peoples wants.

I guess future computing goes somewhere between M$ and *nix worlds.

Z!re
Veteran
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:15 am

Post by Z!re » Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:27 am

Patz QuickBASIC Creations wrote:
Billgatus of Borg wrote:and viral invulnerability
UNIX-based OSes (MAC OS X included)
Ha h a h a haa hh h aah ha aa hhh aah ha ha ahh aha ahh ah aha
I have left this dump.

User avatar
rdc
Coder
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:23 am
Location: Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by rdc » Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:58 am

Quantum computing. No moving parts, clock cycles at the speed of light, true multitasking with a single cpu, unlimited memory.

Of course a new version of FreeBasic would have to be written. :)
Really Dysfunctional Coder

MystikShadows
Veteran
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 7:36 am
Contact:

Post by MystikShadows » Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:04 am

LOL of course ;-)....
When God created light, so too was born, the first Shadow!

MystikShadows

Need hosting? http://www.jc-hosting.net

Interested in Text & ASCII development? Look no further!
http://www.ascii-world.com

bungytheworm
Veteran
Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:02 pm

Post by bungytheworm » Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am

cpu's that can produce good rock and cold beer in speed of light.
Done, end, quit, system, return 0; :lol:

Post Reply