If you have questions about any aspect of QBasic programming, or would like to help fellow programmers solve their problems, check out this board!
Moderators: Pete , Mods
PQBC a la escuela
Post
by PQBC a la escuela » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:17 pm
is DOSbox for Linux and fully supporting PDS? I know QBasic works...
{Nathan}
Veteran
Posts: 1169 Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: The wetlands of central Ohio, USA
Contact:
Post
by {Nathan} » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:36 pm
yes and yes as far as my knowledge goes.
Guest
Veteran
Posts: 128 Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Contact:
Post
by Guest » Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:55 pm
All I know is is that DOS and Windows emulations suck. The best is to run it with the real thing.
m2j
Post
by m2j » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:18 am
Except working on a project through DOS is a bitch. Running the end product is fine, but when you can only deal with one program at a time it really slows the fork out of progress...
matt
Guest
Veteran
Posts: 128 Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Contact:
Post
by Guest » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:03 pm
Yeah, no kidding...
{Nathan}
Veteran
Posts: 1169 Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: The wetlands of central Ohio, USA
Contact:
Post
by {Nathan} » Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:38 pm
Yeah, there is a great challenge for you seb. Make a multitaking, FAST dos emulator for dos... that would really kick ass and you could get really fork famous.
Z!re
Veteran
Posts: 887 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:15 am
Post
by Z!re » Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:06 am
It cant be done.. DOS offer too little memory.. DOS has no "shared" hardware simulation..
So in short, everything would use the same mem and use the same hardware, "at the same time"
I have left this dump.
m2j
Post
by m2j » Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:58 am
Windows 3.1 anyone?
{Nathan}
Veteran
Posts: 1169 Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: The wetlands of central Ohio, USA
Contact:
Post
by {Nathan} » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:23 pm
still, running low-mem apps...