DOSbox

PQBC a la escuela · Post by **PQBC a la escuela** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:17 pm

is DOSbox for Linux and fully supporting PDS? I know QBasic works...

{Nathan} · Post by **{Nathan}** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:36 pm

yes and yes as far as my knowledge goes.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:55 pm

All I know is is that DOS and Windows emulations suck. The best is to run it with the real thing.

m2j · Post by **m2j** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:18 am

Except working on a project through DOS is a bitch. Running the end product is fine, but when you can only deal with one program at a time it really slows the fork out of progress...

matt

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:03 pm

Yeah, no kidding...

{Nathan} · Post by **{Nathan}** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:38 pm

Yeah, there is a great challenge for you seb. Make a multitaking, FAST dos emulator for dos... that would really kick ass and you could get really fork famous.

Z!re · Post by **Z!re** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:06 am

It cant be done.. DOS offer too little memory.. DOS has no "shared" hardware simulation..

So in short, everything would use the same mem and use the same hardware, "at the same time"

m2j · Post by **m2j** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:58 am

Windows 3.1 anyone?

{Nathan} · Post by **{Nathan}** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:23 pm

still, running low-mem apps...